Monday, December 8, 2014

Public Meeting Concerning the Proposed Determination in Red Butte Creek Area

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss the proposed determination of water rights within the Red Butte Creek Subdivision, Salt Lake County East Division of Utah Lake/Jordan River Drainage Area (Area No. 57, Book 3). The following information is from the public meeting notice:
What: Public Meeting
Who: Water Users within the Red Butte Creek Area
When: February 4, 2015, 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm
Where: Department of Natural Resources Building, 1594 W. North Temple, Room 1060, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Purpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Third Judicial District Court (Civil No. 360057298), the State Engineer is authorized and ordered to conduct a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both surface and underground, within the drainage area of the Red Butte Creek Subdivision, Salt Lake County East Division, of the Utah Lake and Jordan River Drainage Area in Salt Lake County. Efforts are currently underway and over the next few months, representatives of the Division of Water Rights will be working in the Red Butte Creek area to survey existing water use, contact water users, and review the water rights of record.  In light of this work, the public is invited to a Public Meeting.  Representatives from the Division of Water Rights will be available during this time to discuss the adjudication process, review water rights within the area, and answer questions. If individuals cannot attend, but have questions regarding the adjudication process or water rights within the Red Butte Creek Area; please contact Blake Bingham at (801) 538-7345.
Agenda:
1. Introduction - Blake Bingham, P.E., Adjudication Program Manager
2. Adjudication process presentation
3. Public comments and questions
For more information on the meeting, click here.

Thursday, October 30, 2014

Public Meeting Concerning the Groundwater Appropriation Policies in Goshen Valley

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss the appropriation policies and a proposed study in Goshen Valley, Utah County. The following information is from the public meeting notice:

What: Public Meeting
Who: Water Users in Goshen Valley, Utah County
When: December 2, 2014, 4:00 pm
Where: Goshen Elementary School, 60 North Center, Goshen, UT 84633
Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to discuss groundwater appropriation policies in Goshen Valley located in southwestern Utah County (part of Water Right Area 53) and to present a proposal for a hydrogeologic study of the area. Personnel from the Division of Water Rights will be available to take all questions and comments provided by the general public and interested parties.
If you are unable to attend the meeting, but would like to provide input, please send your written comments to: Division of Water Rights, 1594 West North Temple, Suite 220, P.O. Box 146300, Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6300
Agenda:
1. Introduction - Kent Jones, State Engineer
2. Groundwater appropriation policies - Teresa Wilhelmsen, Utah Lake/Jordan River Regional Engineer
3. Proposed hydrologic study - Stephan Kirby and Lucy Jordan, Utah Geological Survey
4. Public questions/comments

For more information on the meeting, click here.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Public Meeting Concerning the Proposed Determination in Moab Area

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss the proposed determination of water rights within the Taylor Flat Subdivision, Moab Division of Southeastern Colorado River Drainage Area (Area No. 05, Book 3). The following information is from the public meeting notice:

What: Public Meeting
Who: Water Users within the Taylor Flat Area
When: November 18, 2014, 3:30 pm to 4:30 pm
Where: Moab City Center, 217 East Center Street, Moab, UT 84532, (435)259-5121
Purpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Seventh Judicial District Court (Civil No. 4477), the State Engineer has conducted and distributed a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both surface and underground, within the drainage area of the Taylor Flat Subdivision, Moab Division of the Southeastern Colorado River Drainage Area in Grand County.
Per statute, the Division of Water Rights will hold a Public Meeting in order to inform water users and distribute copies of the proposed determination to claimants.  Representatives from the Division of Water Rights will be available during this time to discuss the adjudication process, review water rights within the proposed determination and answer questions.
If individuals cannot attend, but have questions regarding the adjudication process or water rights within the Taylor Flat Area; please contact Blake Bingham at (801) 538-7345.
Agenda:
1. Introduction - Blake Bingham, P.E., Adjudication Program Manager
2. Adjudication process presentation
3. Public comments and questions

For more information on the meeting, click here.

Saturday, August 30, 2014

Southam v. South Despain Ditch Company

Yesterday the Utah Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case of Southam v. South Despain Ditch Company.  This case could have significant impact on how water companies are allowed to regulate and limit share transfers.

This case originates with a share transfer between Jordan School District and Southam's predecessor-in-interest.  South Despain's bylaws include restrictions on share transfers, including requirements that (1) South Despain's board of directors must approve all share transfers; (2) a person cannot acquire shares unless they can connect to South Despain's system; and (3) the shares must be sold for a fixed amount of $1,100 per share.  The school district had 23 shares that it no longer needed, and despite being reminded by South Despain of the share transfer restrictions, the school district held a sealed-bid auction for the 23 shares.  Two water brokers won the auction with a bid of $1,945 per share.  When the purchasers went to South Despain after the sale, South Despain refused to issue the new certificates to them or to recognize them as shareholders in the company. 

This lawsuit ensued.  During the course of the litigation, Mr. Southam acquired the water brokers' interest in the shares.  The district court ruled in favor of South Despain, and Mr. Southam appealed the decision to the Utah Supreme Court. 

in reaching its decision, the Supreme Court relied primarily on a statute contained in the Utah Revised Nonprofit Corporation Act, which provides that "[u]nless otherwise provided by the bylaws, a member of a nonprofit corporation may not transfer (a) a membership; or (b) any right arising from a membership."  Because this statute provides that shares in a nonprofit corporation are not generally transferrable unless the bylaws allow share transfers, the Court concluded that restrictions on transfers are not prohibited.  Based on this conclusion, the Court summarily dismissed Mr. Southam's arguments that prohibitions on share transfers contradict state policies of beneficial use of water and that prohibitions on share transfers violate the common law presumption against rules restricting the alienation of real property.  Ultimately, the Supreme Court upheld the district court and held that South Despain's restrictions on share transfers are enforceable.

The Court's decision raises issues of concern.  For example, the Court's decision seems to signal that water companies can place any restrictions on share transfers, regardless of whether they are legitimate and rational or arbitrary and irrational.  Additionally, as pointed out by Mr. Southam, restrictions on share transfers can conflict with principles of free alienation of property and beneficial use of water.  Finally, restrictions on share transfers could hamper efforts to put the limited resource of water to its highest and best use.  It will be interesting to see if this decision triggers any legislative action during the next session of the Utah Legislature.

To read the full text of the court opinion, click here.

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Priority Cuts on the Virgin River and Tributaries

The following notice was issued by the Utah Division of Water Rights on July 7, 2014:

Water Users on the Virgin River and Associated Tributaries Including:
North Fork, North Creek, Ash Creek, La Verkin Creek,Quail Creek, Leeds Creek, Leap Creek, Toquerville Springs

Due to extremely dry conditions over the last 3 years, the Virgin River and associated tributaries are experiencing significantly diminished flows. Utah law provides that appropriators have priority among themselves according to the dates of their respective appropriations, so that each appropriator is entitled to receive the appropriator's whole supply before any subsequent appropriator has any right (Utah Code Section 73-3-21.1(2)). The state engineer routinely operates distribution systems, including one on the Virgin River where a river commissioner maintains records and distributes water among the appropriators in accordance with their respective rights to carry out purposes of the statute. Typically distributing water among the users on the main stem of the Virgin River has been adequate to accomplish priority distribution objectives, so the system does not include tributaries named in this letter. However, current circumstances have caused senior appropriators on the main stem of the Virgin to question if they are being impaired by junior users on unregulated tributaries and they are now calling for all water which is tributary to the Virgin River to be regulated by priority. This is an extraordinary action which will require an immediate response to be effective.

With this notice, the state engineer is initiating a priority call on the Virgin River including all associated tributaries from the headwaters to the Washington Fields diversion which is the user which initiated the call. This letter is being sent to notify water users of the action and request your cooperation during this extraordinary period.

A public meeting will be held July 15 at 6:00 PM at Washington County Water Conservancy District offices, 533 Waterworks Driven St. George, Utah, if you would like to further understand the process, provide suggestions, or comment.

The Virgin River System is currently being regulated such that all water users with a priority later than 1900 are no longer entitled to divert water. If you are currently diverting water and the priority of your water right is later than December 31, 1900, please immediately cease the use of water until advised by the state engineer your priority is entitled to the use of water. Representatives of the state engineer from the Utah Division of Water Rights wilt be providing further regulation instruction and field checking actual practice. If you are found to be diverting water in violation of instructions you could be subject to significant fines under the state engineer's water right enforcement powers. Water not diverted must be allowed to run to the natural course, and continue downstream to diversions of the senior priority water right holder. All users of water, the source of which could be construed as directlv tributarv to the flows of the Virgin River such as springs and seeps, should discontinue diversions and water is to be allowed to run its natural course.

Water stored earlier in the year in reservoirs is stored water and may be released from the reservoir and rediverted downstream without respect for the current priority call. Change applications which have approved points of diversion in wells are not subject to the priority call from well points of diversion but are subject to the call with respect to any surface points of diversion.

Please see the attached priority schedule that provides water rights listing, with associated water right ownership, listed in order of priority dates and organized into specific rivers and tributaries.

Ash Creek above Ash Creek Reservoir is not included in the attached priority schedule. It is the opinion of the state engineer under current conditions calling water above the reservoir would be a futile call. The East Fork above Zion National Park is a separate distribution system operating under direction of the state engineer and therefore not included in the priority schedule. That system is already operating with diversions limited to priorities prior to 1900. Should priority be further reduced on the Virgin River, calls on the East Fork system will be coordinated between commissioners and administered bv the appointed commissioner on each system.

Background:
One of the fundamental principles of Utah water law is priority between appropriators. There are two ways that priority is established. If water was put to beneficial use prior to 1903 (the date the statutory water right process was adopted), the priority of the water right is the date the appropriator placed the water to beneficial use. After 1903, the priority is the date the application for appropriation was filed with the state engineer.

Priority distribution requires that a senior appropriator's water right be satisfied before a subsequent (junior) appropriator receives any water (Utah Code 73-3-21). Appropriators with the same priority share proportionately in the available water supply according to the amount of their individual rights. An appropriator's water right is considered satisfied if either they are receiving all water entitled under the definition of the right or they choose not to divert their water right or to divert only a portion of their water right.

An appropriator is not authorized by law to dictate the next right in priority; that is, they cannot determine who should receive the water if they choose not to divert it. A water right extends only to controlling one's own diversion and use of water. If a senior right is satisfied, the opportunity to divert falls to the next water right in priority according to the priority date of the water right.

A junior upstream appropriator is not required to reduce their diversion if doing so would not increase the water supply available to a prior downstream appropriator who is not receiving their full water right. In this situation, a call by a senior appropriator for a junior appropriator to reduce their diversion is a futile call. A water user may not determine that a futile call situation exists; the State Engineer determines when a call is futile. This rule also allows appropriators with non-consumptive uses (power generation) to divert water out of priority; since the use is non-consumptive (and the entire flow is returned to the source) curtailing the diversion will not change the water supply available to downstream water users.

Utah does not recognize de-minimis use. A junior appropriator may not use the argument that their diversion has a minimal or negligible effect on a senior appropriator to avoid curtailment if the senior right is not satisfied. No matter how small the effect, if there is a cause and effect relationship, the junior right must yield to the senior appropriator.

Within a water distribution system organized by the State Engineer, a water commissioner is appointed by the State Engineer to regulate the distribution of water (under the direction of the State Engineer) according to the priority of the water rights on the system. The Water Commissioner for the Virgin River system monitors diversions from the system and also regulates water during priority regulation conditions. You may be receiving a visit from the Virgin River Water Commissioner during the regulation period. Water Rights staff will be supplementing his efforts on the tributary streams.

According to state law (UCA 73-5-15), water users are required to install and maintain control structures and measuring devices that meet state engineer approval. Please insure your diversion has functional control (head gate) structures and measuring devices.

The distribution of water from surfaces sources (rivers, streams, springs etc.) is regulated by priority as described. The distribution of water from underground wells and developed springs which have now been shown to directly affect the flow of surface sources is not regulated under the current call.

Dated the 7th day of July, 2014
By Kent L. Jones, State Engineer

For a copy of the priority schedule referenced in the notice, click here.

Friday, June 13, 2014

Public Meeting Concerning the Proposed Determination Within the Ash Creek Division

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss the proposed determination of water rights within the Ash Creek Division of the Virgin River Drainage (Book 81-3). The following information is from the public meeting notice:

What: Public Meeting
Who: Water Users within the Ash Creek area (i.e., Town of Kanarraville, Town of New Harmony, City of Toquerville, and the City of Laverkin)
When: July 1, 2014, 6:00 - 7:00 PM
Where: Hurricane Valley Library, 36 South 300 West, Hurricane, Utah
Purpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Fifth Judicial District Court (Civil No. 800507596), the State Engineer is authorized and ordered to conduct a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both surface and underground, within the drainage area of the Ash Creek Division of the Virgin River drainage area in Washington and Iron Counties.
Efforts are currently underway and over the past few months, representatives of the Division of Water Rights have worked in the Ash Creek area to survey existing water use, contact water users, and review the water rights of record. In light of this work, the public is invited to a Public Meeting. Representatives from the Division of Water Rights will be available during this time to discuss the adjudication process, review water rights within the area, and answer questions.
If individuals cannot attend, but have questions regarding the adjudication process or water rights within the Ash Creek area; please contact Blake Bingham at (801) 538-7345.

Agenda:
1. Introduction Blake Bingham, P.E. - Adjudication Program Manager
2. Adjudication Process Presentation
3. Public Comments & Questions

For more information on the meeting, click here.

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Public Meeting Concerning the Propoosed Determination Within the Orem Subdivision

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss the proposed determination of water rights within the Orem Subdivision of the Provo River Division in the Utah Lake / Jordan River Drainage (Area No. 55, Book 3). The following information is from the public meeting notice:

What: Public Meeting
Who: Water Users within the Orem Area (i.e., City of Orem, Town of Vineyard, portions of Provo City located north or west of the Provo River, and the southern portion of Lindon City)
When: May 13, 2014, 4:00 - 5:00 PM
Where: Central Utah Water Conservancy District, 355 West University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058
Purpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Third Judicial District Court (Civil No. 360057298), the State Engineer is authorized and ordered to conduct a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both surface and underground, within the drainage area of the Orem Subdivision, Provo River Division, of the Utah Lake and Jordan River Area in Utah County.
Efforts are currently underway and over the past few months, representatives of the Division of Water Rights have worked in the Orem Area to survey existing water use, contact water users, and review the water rights of record. In light of this work, the public is invited to a Public Meeting. Representatives from the Division of Water Rights will be available during this time to discuss the adjudication process, review water rights within the area, and answer questions.
If individuals cannot attend, but have questions regarding the adjudication process or water rights within the Orem Area; please contact Blake Bingham at (801) 538-7345.

Agenda:
1. Introduction Blake Bingham, P.E. - Adjudication Program Manager
2. Adjudication Process Presentation
3. Public Comments & Questions

For more information on the meeting, click here.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Central Utah Water Conservancy District v. Jensen

In 2011, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in the Jensen v. Jones, in which the Court held that the State Engineer could not consider alleged forfeiture in determining whether or not to grant a change application.  The Court did not, however, determine whether the water right owned by Jensen had actually been forfeited. 

A few months after the Court's decision, Central Utah Water Conservancy District ("CUWCD") initiated a separate lawsuit in district court against Jensen seeking to have Jensen's water right declared forfeited.  On March 12, 2014, the district court issued a ruling in which the court concluded that the Jensen water right was forfeited for nonuse.

The district court first addressed Jensen's argument that CUWCD should be estopped from bringing the forfeiture action because a lawsuit alleging forfeiture should have been brought before Jensen spent significant time and money pursuing the change application.  Although the court acknowledged these costs, the court concluded that the legal standard of "manifest injustice" had not been met and that Jensen had not materially altered their course of conduct based on the CUWCD's alleged inaction.  The court also noted that the doctrine of beneficial use was established to protect the public and Utah's limited resource of water, and therefore it was in the public interest to allow CUWCD to pursue its forfeiture claim.

The court next addressed the primary issue of whether the Jensen water right had been forfeited.  The court focused primarily on Jensen's inability to produce any documents, records, or evidence that she or her predecessors had beneficially used the water right for at least 25 years, as well as prior acknowledgments that no beneficial use had occurred.  Although Jensen urged the court to balance the requirement of beneficial use of water against the public policy of protecting property rights, the court declined to do so, concluding that Utah Code section 73-1-4 did not require or allow any such balancing.  The court also rejected Jensen's arguments that forfeiture should not apply due to alleged unavailability of water in the source and due to the pending change application.

It is currently unknown if Jensen will appeal this decision.  If the ruling stands, it will surely result in an end to the still-pending case regarding the State Engineer's denial of the change application.  It is also unknown to what extent, if any, this ruling may have on future legislative considerations of legislation relating to the State Engineer's authority to review beneficial use and nonuse in the context of a change application.

Monday, March 10, 2014

Public Meeting Concerning a Groundwater Management Plan for Moab / Spanish Valley

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss the process for developing a groundwater management plan for the Moab / Spanish Valley area. The following information is from the public meeting notice:

What: Public Meeting Who: Moab / Spanish Valley water users
When: April 16, 2014, 3:00 PM
Where: Grand Center of Moab, 182 North 500 West, Moab, UT 84532
Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the process for developing a groundwater management plan for Moab / Spanish Valley. Personnel from the Division of Water Rights will be available to take all questions and comments provided by the general public and interested parties.
Agenda:
1. Welcome and Introduction - Kent Jones, State Engineer
2. Current Policy for Moab / Spanish Valley – Dave Horsley, Assistant Regional Engineer
3. Ground Water Management Plans and Spanish Valley Hydrologic Data – Jim Reese
4. What are the Next Steps – Marc Stilson, Regional Engineer
5. Public Questions/Comments

For more information about the public meeting, click here.

Friday, February 28, 2014

2014 Legislature: Canal Safety Amendments

Representative Johnny Anderson has introduced House Bill 370 (HB 370), entitled "Canal Safety Amendments."  The bill would require the State Engineer to make and maintain an inventory list of all open canal/ditch systems in the state.  For each system, the list would include the alignment of the canals and ditches, the contact information for the owner, the maximum flow of the system, whether the system is used for storm water management, and whether a management plan has been adopted for the system.  The bill would allow the State Engineer to contract with the Utah Association of Conservation Districts to perform these duties, and would require the State Engineer to contract with the Association to provide technical support to canal owners who are adopting a management plan.  The bill would also modify the definition of a "water conveyance facility."  Current law exempts fully piped pressurized systems from the definition, but this bill would also exempt fully piped systems that are not pressurized.

To read a full copy of the bill, as amended, click here.

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

2014 Legislature: Water Conveyance Facilities Amendments

Representative Carol Moss has introduced House Bill 298 (HB 298), entitled "Water Conveyance Facilities Amendments." This bill makes only one change to existing canal safety laws, which is that it exempts ditch systems that carry less than 15 cubic feet per second (cfs) from the canal safety requirements.

To read the full text of the bill, as introduced, click here.

Monday, January 27, 2014

2014 Legislative Preview: Public Trust

Representative Kay McIff has introduced House Bill 233 (H.B. 233), entitled "Public Trust Obligations and Water Rights Protections."  This bill seeks to define the scope and limits of the public trust doctrine in Utah. The bill also clarifies that a water right is a property right that is protected by the Utah Constitution, and cannot be taken for public use without just compensation.

This bill is nearly identical to HB 68 that Representative McIff ran in 2013.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

Monday, January 20, 2014

2014 Legislative Preview: County Recorder Water Index

Representative Curt Webb will introduce House Bill 29 (HB 29), entitled "County Recorder Index Amendments."  The bill only makes one change to the statute defining the duties of the county recorders: it requires the county recorders to keep an index of water right numbers that are included in deeds after May 13, 2014.

To read the full text of the bill, as introduced, click here.

Update: This bill was passed on February 24, 2014, and will now go to Governor Herbert for signature.

2014 Legislative Preview: Canal Safety Act

Senator Gene Davis will introduce Senate Bill 114 (SB 114), entitled "Canal Safety Act."  The bill seeks to enact several new statutes to govern canal safety issues.  The bill begins by defining a canal as a water conveyance system that conveys a flow of more than 10 cfs of water.  The bill would require all canal owners to conduct an assessment of the condition of each canal before January 1, 2015, and at least once every five years thereafter.  The canal owner must determine whether each section of the canal is high risk, medium risk, or low risk; determine if any repairs or improvements are necessary to reduce the risk of canal failure; and report the findings to the Utah Division of Water Rights.  The Division would then maintain a "canal action list" to include all canals that are high risk and/or require repairs or improvements.  If a canal is on the canal action list, the canal owner must prepare a remediation plan, which must be approved by the Division of Water Rights and the Division of Water Resources.  The canal owner cannot receive state funding for a project related to the canal unless they have an approved remediation plan.

To read the full text of the bill, as introduced, click here.

2014 Legislative Preview: Water and Irrigation Amendments

Senator Margaret Dayton will introduce Senate Bill 17 (SB 17), entitled "Water and Irrigation Amendments."  The bill is a "clean-up bill" that makes several small changes to the Utah Water Code.  First, the bill would expand the State Engineer's enforcement powers by allowing the State Engineer to pursue an enforcement action against a person who violates the law requiring a stream alteration permit for work done in a natural streambed.  Second, the bill would require assignments of unperfected water rights to be recorded with the proper county recorder instead of just being filed with the Division of Water Rights.  Third, the bill seeks to clarify the criminal penalties for well drillers operating without a current license.  Fourth, the bill proposes changes to the statute governing stream alteration permits, including giving the State Engineer authority to issue orders for repair and restoration of streambeds altered without a permit.  Finally, the bill proposes technical changes to the statute governing the State Engineer's duties to divide and distribute water.

To read the full text of SB 17, as introduced, click here.

Update: This bill was passed on February 13, 2014, and will now go to Governor Herbert for signature.

2014 Legislative Preview: Public Water Access

Representative Dixon M. Pitcher will introduce House Bill 37 (HB 37) during the 2014 legislative session.  The bill seeks to make sweeping changes to the Utah Public Water Access Act.  Under the bill, "public access water" would be defined as a stream that in its natural state during ordinary high water is capable of (1) floating cut lumber six feet in length and six inches in diameter; (2) floating a commercial commodity; or (3) being navigated by a watercraft propelled by oar, paddle, or motor.  The bill would completely repeal several code sections of the current Act and replace them with new code sections.  These new statutes would provide that public access water at or below the ordinary high water mark would be open to public use for lawful activities that utilize the water, including boating, fishing, swimming, and wading.  The bill would limit members of the public from crossing private property to get to the public access water, but would allow the public reasonable portage across private property to avoid obstructions in the waterway.  The bill would also allow the property owner to fence across the waterway, so long as the fence complies with law and does not create an unreasonably dangerous condition to those using the waterway, and provided that the property owner allow public users to use a ladder, gate, or other mechanism to portage around or over the fence.

To read the full text of HB 37, as introduced, click here.

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Nevada Court Ruling on Las Vegas Pipeline Project


The following article was written by David Hartvigsen, one of my partners at Smith Hartvigsen, PLLC, for the Water & The Law newsletter that our firm publishes on a quarterly basis. If you would like to receive an email version of the newsletter, please click here to join our mailing list.

One of the most controversial pipeline projects in recent memory was dealt a major blow last month as Nevada District Court Judge Robert Estes issued a ruling against the project, a coalition supported management plan, and the Nevada State Engineer.  We in Utah refer to the project as the “Snake Valley Project” because it affects the aquifer under Snake Valley, which is partially located in Millard County.  The project proposed by the Southern Nevada Water Authority (“SNWA”) also includes pumping water from four other valleys located solely within Nevada, i.e., Spring Valley, Cave Valley, Dry Lake Valley, and Delamar Valley, and then piping the water down to the very thirsty Las Vegas area.  These five valleys are comparable in size to New England, i.e., parts or all of the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York.  The judge characterized it as “likely the largest interbasin transfer of water in U.S. history.”
The applications to appropriate water from these 5 valleys were first filed in 1989 and hearings were held on the applications in 2006.  However, because Nevada law requires that the State Engineer rule on applications within one year of the protest deadline, the original approvals were vacated by the courts and the process was restarted.  Prior to the second round of hearing in 2011, several federal agencies agreed to withdraw their protests if SNWA agreed to  implement a Hydrologic and Biologic Monitoring, Management, and Mitigation Plan (“MMM Plan”).  The State Engineer incorporated this MMM Plan into his March 2012 approval of the Project applications.
Several of the protestants appealed the approvals and the appeal was presided over by Senior Judge Estes in 7th District Court of Nevada.  Two days of hearings on the appeal where held last June, then the judge went to work reviewing the evidence and the law.  He issued a ruling dated December 10, 2013 in which he vacated the March 2012 approvals and sent them back to the State Engineer for re-evaluation and action consistent with his ruling on four key points: “(1) The addition of Millard and Juab [C]ounties, Utah in the [MMM] Plan so far as water basins in Utah are affected by pumping water from Spring Valley Basin, Nevada; (2) A recalculation of water available for appropriation from Spring Valley assuring that the basin will reach equilibrium between discharge and recharge in a reasonable time; (3) Define standards, thresholds, or triggers so that mitigation of unreasonable effects from pumping of water are neither arbitrary nor capricious in Spring Valley, Cave Valley, Dry Lake Valley, and Delamar Valley; and (4) Recalculate the appropriations from Cave Valley, Dry Lake and Delamar Valley to avoid over appropriations or conflicts with down-gradient, existing water rights.”
The judge pointed out serious flaws and omissions in the MMM Plan and rejected the State Engineer’s calculations under the plan, concluding that the diversion of the amounts approved would exceed the safe yield of the Spring Valley aquifer and that equilibrium would never be reached, despite compliance with the MMM Plan.  The Judge also found the MMM Plan to be “subjective, unscientific, arbitrary and capricious,” stating that it doesn’t even offer a clear definition of what an unreasonable impact might be.  He concluded that the “[g]ranting of water to SNWA is premature without knowing the impacts to existing water right holders and not having a clear standard to identify impacts, conflicts or unreasonable environmental effects so that mitigation may proceed in a timely manner.” 
To read the full court opinion, click here.

Friday, January 3, 2014

Public Meeting Regarding an Update to the Groundwater Appropriation Policies in Pine Valley, Wah Wah Valley, and Sevier Lake Area

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss updates to the groundwater appropriation policies in Pine Valley, Wah Wah Valley, and the Sevier Lake area. The following information is from the public meeting notice:

What: Public Meeting
Who: Water Users in Pine Valley, Wah Wah Valley, and the Sevier Lake area
When:  February 4, 2014, 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM
Where: Milford City Offices, 26 South 100 West, Milford, UT 84751
Purpose: The purpose of the meeting is to present a summary of a hydrogeologic study currently being completed by the USGS and to present an update to the groundwater appropriation polices for Pine Valley (WR Area 14), Wah Wah Valley, and the Sevier Lake area (WR Area 69). Personnel from the Division of Water Rights will be available to take all questions and comments provided by the general public and interested parties.
Agenda:

1.  Introduction - Kent Jones, State Engineer
2.  USGS Study Update - Phil Gardner
3.  Policy update - Kurt Vest, Southwestern Regional Engineer
4.  Public Questions/Comments
For the current appropriation policies for Pine Valley, click here
For the current appropriation policies for Wah Wah Valley and Sevier Lake area, click here.

For more information about the public meeting, click here.

Thursday, January 2, 2014

Public Meeting Concerning the Proposed Determination of Water Rights in the Birdseye Area

The Utah Division of Water Rights has set a public meeting to discuss the ongoing general adjudication in the Birdseye area. The following information is from the public meeting notice:

What: Public Meeting
Who: Water Users within the Birdseye Area
When: January 29th, 2014, 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Where: Spanish Fork City Fairgrounds, High Chapparal Room, 475 South Main Street, Spanish Fork, UT 84660
Purpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Third Judicial District Court (Civil No. 57298), the State Engineer is authorized and ordered to conduct a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both surface and underground, within the drainage area of Utah Lake and the Jordan River within Salt Lake County.
The hydrographic survey associated with the Birdseye adjudication has revealed several discrepancies relating to beneficial use, place of use, and ownership of various Strawberry Valley Project water right exchanges.  In an effort to guide water users through the necessary steps to resolve the discrepancies associated with their respective SVP exchange(s), the Division of Water Rights will be holding a Public Meeting.  Following a brief presentation, representatives from the Division of Water Rights will be available to discuss the adjudication process, review SVP exchange(s), and answer questions.
 

For more information about the public meeting, click here.