Saturday, March 29, 2025

2025 Legislature - Water Bills That Passed

There was a long list of water-related bills that were passed during the 2025 session of the Utah Legislature. Below are the bill summaries (drafted by the water attorneys at Smith Hartvigsen) about these bills that passed.

HB 41 (1st Substitute) – State Water Policy
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

House Bill 41 amends Utah Code section 73-1-21, which enunciates water policy for the State of Utah. The bills adds promotion of the quality of groundwater, in addition to lakes and rivers already listed. It also adds the study of saved water, “the monitoring [in consultation with watershed councils] of activities in watersheds that provide water to drinking water systems to protect the watersheds”; the promotion of “state water planning, including the formation of the state water plan”; and “water reuse with appropriate conditions for the region in which the water reuse” as water policy objectives. The original version of the bill removed the phrase “balanc[ing] social, economic, public interest, and environmental” from two places in the statute, but this phrase was reinserted into the first substitute that was ultimately passed.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 46 – Water Rights Applications Amendments
Rep. Doug Owens

House Bill 46 modifies Utah Code section 73-3-18 regarding the State Engineer’s process of reinstating lapsed applications. The law previously allowed the State Engineer to reinstate a lapsed application within 60 days of the lapsed application upon a showing of reasonable cause but gave no guidance on how a water right owner was to file this request for reinstatement. HB 46 directs the State Engineer to create a reinstatement form that will be used (in conjunction with a request for extension of time) for future requests to reinstate lapsed applications within the 60-day time period. The bill also provides that if an application is reinstated, the priority date will be changed to the date that the request for reinstatement was filed.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 47 – Public Lands Water Rights Amendments
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

House Bill 47 modifies Utah Code sections 73-2-14 and 73-3-31 regarding water claims under Public Water Reserve No. 107. In 1926, President Calvin Coolidge created Public Water Reserve Number 107 through an executive order. Public Water Reserve No. 107 reserved land containing water for the federal government to manage livestock watering on these lands. The rationale behind Public Water Reserve No. 107 was to promote western settlement and prevent monopolization of scarce water resources on federally managed lands. Public Water Reserve Number 107 created federal reserved water rights that are leased by the federal government to private individuals for grazing. Utah Code sections 73-2-14 and 73-3-31 did not recognize Public Water Reserve No. 107 separately and instead combined Public Water Reserve No. 107 uses with livestock water use certificates held by public agencies. HB 47 recognizes that Public Water Reserve No. 107 uses are unique and establishes a procedure and guidelines for federal agencies to file information with the Division of Water Rights so that the State Engineer may determine beneficial use for water claims under Public Water Reserve No. 107.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 81 (1st Substitute) – Fluoride Amendments
Rep. Stephanie Gricius

House Bill 81 prohibits public water suppliers from adding fluoride into a public water system.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 89 (1st Substitute) – Water Transfer Amendments
Rep. Gay Lynn Bennion

House Bill 89 modifies Utah Code section 75-3-1201 regarding “small estate affidavits.” A small estate affidavit is used when a person has passed away and has personal property (such as furniture, jewelry, money in bank accounts, shares of stock, etc.) that are still in the deceased person’s name. The family of the deceased person can fill out the affidavit and then use the affidavit to have the personal property transferred out of the name of the deceased person and into the name of the successors/heirs. The affidavit cannot be used to transfer title to real property and the affidavit can only be used if the total value of the assets is less than $100,000. In the past, the small estate affidavit has been used in circumstances where a deceased person owned shares of stock in an irrigation company and the successors/heirs are seeking to have the irrigation company re-issue the shares into the name of the successors/heirs. HB 89 disallows this practice. The bill states that “Shares of stock in a water company . . . are not eligible for transfer” using the small estate affidavit. This means that successors/heirs will be forced to go through the probate process in court in order to get water shares transferred out of the name of a deceased person.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 174 – Water Rights Restricted Account
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

House Bill 174 modifies Utah Code section 73-2-1.6 regarding how the Division of Water Rights can utilize funds in the Water Rights Restricted Account. Previously, the law allowed the Division to use funds for legal support related to water right adjudications. HB 174 allows the Division to use funds for general legal support (i.e., “not limited to geographic areas of adjudication”).

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 243 – Agriculture Water Optimization Amendments
Rep. Casey Snider

House Bill 243 amends two code sections in the Agricultural Water Optimization Act. The law previously required a 25% match for “a drip or automated surge irrigation project.” This language is amended to clarify that the match is for “(A) a subsurface drip irrigation project; (B) an automated surge irrigation project; or (C) a measurement, telemetry, or reporting project.” The bill also adds a provision that money in the Agricultural Water Optimization Account can be used for research that “establishes methods for measuring saved water or the effectiveness of the agricultural water optimization funding.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 274 (5th Substitute) - Water Amendments
Rep. Casey Snider

The Legislature passed House Bill 274 in the final hours of the 2025 legislative session. The bill will authorize culinary water suppliers to enact tiered “conservation” rates to help implement water conservation efforts “designed to incentivize, encourage, or result in reduced water usage or more efficient use of water.” Such rates would be presumed to be reasonable and to reflect a water provider’s actual costs. By July 1, 2027, retail water suppliers (i.e., culinary water suppliers with over 500 service connections) would be required to “consider at least one conservation effort” in setting their highest block unit of water for residential customers.

The bill also includes several provisions regarding secondary water suppliers. Among other things, it would require secondary water suppliers to begin billing end users using a tiered conservation rate that considers revenue stability, water conservation, and cost of service, “regardless of whether the secondary water supplies is fully metered or has modified existing contracts with end users.” Similarly, all contracts between an end user and a secondary water supplier executed or renewed after July 1, 2025, would be required to allow for billing by tiered conservation rates. By April 30, 2030, secondary water suppliers must begin providing an “educational component for end users” as determined by the Division of Water Resources.

Notwithstanding these provisions, the Legislature approved a substituted from Senator Kevin Stratton that, starting on July 1, 2030, will require secondary water suppliers to “charge an end user at the lowest rate of the tiered conservation rate if the end user is using a portion of the water to grow food, including growing a garden, fruit trees, or pasture for grazing.” This language will likely be revised prior to 2030.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 285 (1st Substitute) - Water Infrastructure Amendments
Rep. Casey Snider

House Bill 285 is the next step forward for Rep. Snider’s HB 280, passed in 2024, which is intended to centralize water infrastructure funding in the state. The bill repeals the Water Resources Cities Water Loan Fund, redirecting payments for those loans into the Water Infrastructure Fund created by HB 280. It also allows the Water Infrastructure Fund to transfer money to and receive money from the Water Resources Conservation and Development Fund overseen by the Board of Water Resources, the Water Quality Security – Utah Wastewater Loan Program Subaccount overseen by the Water Quality Board, and the Drinking Water Security – Drinking Water Loan Program Subaccount overseen by the Drinking Water Board. Starting with Fiscal Year 2027, the respective boards will examine their respective funds to determine how much money should be transferred to the Water Infrastructure Fund. The amount to be transferred will be quantified by examining the amount of money needed to fund loans authorized by each board in the previous year. The bill also requires public water systems wishing to receive state or federal financing or grants to adopt capital asset management plans by July 1, 2028.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 311 (3rd Substitute) - Watershed Amendments
Rep. Casey Snider

While House Bill 311 started as an effort to regulate hydropower facilities, the first substitute replaced all of the contents of the bill and changed its focus to the Utah water agent, a position that was created in 2024’s SB 211. The bill changes the focus of the water agent from water importation to water augmentation projects, and allows the water agent to pursue such projects in the Bear River and Colorado River Basins (which were previously off limits). It also clarifies that the Board of Water Resources may enter into a contract for a water augmentation project recommended by the water agent.

With time running short at the end of the legislative session, the third substitute incorporated key language from HB 415, Water Commissioner Amendments, and HB 507, Legislative Water Development Commission Amendments, both of which failed to pass. By incorporating the HB 415 elements into HB 311, water commissioners may be eligible for state health and retirement benefits if those benefits are approved by the commissioner’s distribution system committee. The HB 507 language incorporated into HB 311 changes the number of legislators who are appointed to the Legislative Water Development Commission.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 520 (2nd Substitute) - Water Entity Amendments
Rep. Casey Snider

House Bill 520 (2nd Su made several changes regarding several government offices and their relationship with the Department of Natural Resources (“Department”). First, it requires the state water agent to coordinate with the Department. Second, the bill removes the “independent entity” status of the Great Salt Lake Commissioner and the Office of the Commissioner, which will now be housed within the Department of Natural Resources. Similarly, the bill removes the independent entity status of the Colorado River Authority of Utah. Under Utah Code 63H-9-101, independent entities are public entities that are individually created by the state but are separate and apart from the judicial and legislative branches of state government and are not under the direct supervisory control of the governor.

The bill also made changes to the laws governing the grant program that provided $40M to the National Audubon Society and The Nature Conservancy to establish the private Great Salt Lake Watershed Enhancement Trust. Under the bill, the Great Salt Lake Commissioner will serve as a non-voting member of the Trust’s council of advisors and must consult with the council and obtain a recommendation from the council before expending “money for the purpose of acquiring or leasing water or water rights” for Great Salt Lake.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HCR 1 – Regarding the Grand County Water Conservancy District
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

HCR 1 supports the transfer of water infrastructure from the United States Department of Energy to the Grand County Water Conservancy District. The infrastructure is currently used in the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project to remove radioactive uranium mill tailings from a 130-acre tailings pile adjacent to the Colorado River, just north of Moab. The tailings are transported by rail to a remote off-river site near Crescent Junction. These tailings posed a serious threat to the Colorado River. If not removed, a major flood event would wash the tailings into the river and create a catastrophe for the millions of people who rely on the Colorado River below Moab. This federally funded Project, which is nearing completion, began in 2008 and has already removed 14.4 million tons of tailings. Once the Project is complete, the water infrastructure will no longer be needed by the Department of Energy and can be used for the benefit of Grand County.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 33 – Water Right Recording Amendments
Sen. Evan J. Vickers

Senate Bill 33 revises Utah Code section 57-3-109 regarding water right deed addenda. The law previously required that the grantor’s signature on the addendum must be an original signature, whereas the grantee’s signature could be “by facsimile or electronic means.” SB 33 allows for both the grantor’s and grantee’s signatures to be “by facsimile or electronic means.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 36 (1st Substitute) – Water Quality Board Amendments
Sen. Todd D. Weiler

Senate Bill 36 revises Utah Code section 19-5-104 to establish a process for the Utah Quality Board to review penalty negotiations between the director and a publicly-owned entity in alleged violation of the Water Quality Act and to recommend a final order establishing a reasonable penalty following a settlement conference.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 80 (3rd Substitute) - Drinking Water Amendments
Sen. Scott D. Sandall

Senate Bill 80 (3rd Substitute) authorizes and requires the Department of Environmental Quality to establish an annual fee on the basis of domestic water consumption that will be assessed against public water systems to help fund Utah’s Safe Drinking Water program. Under the bill, the Department will undertake a rulemaking process to establish the fees and will be required to consider several factors, including but not limited to program costs and the indirect costs of regulating public water systems in Utah, after consulting with stakeholders.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

2025 Legislature - Water Bills That Did Not Pass

There were a number of water-related bills that were considered during the 2025 legislative session that were ultimately not passed. Below are bill summaries (drafted by the water attorneys at Smith Hartvigsen) about these bills that did not pass.

HB 45 (1st Substitute) – Irrigation Amendments
Rep. Rex P. Shipp

House Bill 45 sought to modify Utah Code section 73-1-8 regarding the duties and liabilities of the owners or operators of irrigation ditches and canals. While the section already specifies that the owners or operators of water facilities must exercise “reasonable and ordinary care” in operating and maintaining those facilities, the bill sought to clearly assign liability to the owners or operators of ditches and canals if their failure to meet that care standard results in the property damage or injury to others. In addition, if an individual is held liable to a third party for any damage or injury directly caused by the failure of an owner or operator to exercise reasonable and ordinary care in maintaining a ditch or canal located within a municipality, the bill sought to allow that individual to recover the amount for which they are liable from the owner or operator of the ditch or canal.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 318 - Residential Turf Amendments
Rep. Doug Owens

House Bill 318 sought to require lawn or turf restrictions for any single-family home constructed after May 7, 2025. Specifically, it would have required lawn or turf areas exceeding 600 square feet for a lot size less than 4,000 square feet or for a lot size greater than 4,000 square feet, the lesser of 15% of the lot’s square footage, or 2,500 square feet.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 328 - Water Usage Amendments
Rep. Doug Owens

House Bill 328 sought to mandate that counties and municipalities require compliance of overhead spray irrigation in some situations as part of the land use approval process. The bill would have also prohibited new developments or redevelopments to use overhead spray irrigation except under special circumstances.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 330 - Water Sprinkler Efficiency Requirements
Rep. Doug Owens

House Bill 330 sought to prohibit the sale of spray sprinklers that do not have an integral pressure regulator or did not meet the requirements under the WaterSense Specification for Spray Sprinkler Bodies, Version 1.0 adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 492 (1st Substitute) - Drinking Water Utilities Amendments
Rep. Colin W. Jack

House Bill 492 (1st Substitute) would have required community water systems in Utah to complete a cybersecurity plan according to the standards in the Bill and report a security breach to the Utah Cyber Center within two hours of discovering the breech. It also had provisions requiring community water systems to make information on security plans and incidents to the Director of the Division of Drinking Water. The Division of Drinking Water was required to report annually to two legislative interim committees - the Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Committee and the Public Utilities, Energy, and Technology Committee - on cybersecurity incidents and plans at community water systems. Under HB 492, a community water system’s security plan was designated as a protected record under the Governmental Access and Management Act. HB 492 passed the House but died in the Senate.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 536 - Water Usage Notification Amendments
Rep. Doug Owens

House Bill 536 sought to require retail water suppliers to provide notifications to end users if their water use significantly escalates during a month. The Division of Water Resources would have defined what constituted “significantly escalates.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 92 (1st Substitute) – Golf Course Amendments
Sen. Daniel McCay

Senate Bill 92 sought to authorize the Utah State University Institute of Land, Water, and Air to study the use of water on golf courses in the state. The Institute would identify best practices for water use in Utah relative to golf courses, and then work with golf course owners to “identify strategic water saving opportunities.” The bill also sought to set up an advisory committee of golf professionals to consult with the Institute. Additionally, the bill would have required the Division of State Parks to develop a master plan for state-owned golf courses, which would address water use and conservation. Finally, the bill would have classified water data records provided to the Institute as “protected records” under GRAMA.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 131 (1st Substitute) – Water Commitment Amendments
Sen. Nate Blouin

Senate Bill 131 sought to amend Utah Code section 73-10-32 regarding water conservation plans. SB 131 would have added a provision that a water conservation plan may include information regarding “the commitment of available water to uses on the Great Salt Lake.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 305 - Water Wise Landscaping Amendments
Sen. Keven J. Stratton

Senate Bill 305 sought to modify water wise regulations for state government facilities that were enacted in 2022. The bill sought to prohibit the use of overhead spray irrigation at government facilities and require water wise landscaping.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

Thursday, January 23, 2025

New Adjudication Areas in South Utah County

The Utah Division of Water Rights has established the boundaries for four new water right general adjudication areas in southern Utah County. The four new adjudication areas are:
  • Santaquin (Area 51-6)
  • Benjamin (Area 51-7)
  • Spanish Fork / Mapleton (Area 51-8)
  • Payson / Salem (Area 51-9)
The boundaries of the adjudication areas are depicted below.



Friday, January 17, 2025

2025 Legislative Preview

The 2025 general session of the Utah Legislature begins next week. Below are summaries (written by the water attorneys at Smith Hartvigsen) of the water-related bills that have been released so far. As the session goes along, additional water bills will certainly be added.

HB 41 – State Water Policy
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

House Bill 41 seeks to amend Utah Code section 73-1-21, which enunciates water policy for the State of Utah. This bill came out of the Legislative Water Development Commission and will likely have widespread support. It adds promotion of the quality of groundwater, in addition to lakes and rivers already listed. It also adds “the monitoring of activities in watersheds that provide water to drinking water systems to protect the watersheds”; the promotion of “state water planning, including the formation of the state water plan as provided in Section 73-10-15”; and “water reuse with appropriate conditions for the region in which the water reuse” as water policy objectives.

All of the additions are laudable and will likely have little opposition. There are two deletions from existing water policy in the bill which may be controversial. The first is the deletion of the “balanc[ing] social, economic, public interest, and environmental” needs or values when considering water pricing and funding mechanisms or the “study and development of strategies and practices necessary to address declining water levels and protect the water quality and quantity of the Great Salt Lake, Utah Lake, and Bear Lake.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 45 – Irrigation Amendments
Rep. Rex P. Shipp

House Bill 45 seeks to modify Utah Code section 73-1-8 regarding the duties and liabilities of the owners or operators of irrigation ditches and canals. While the section already specifies that the owners or operators of water facilities must exercise “reasonable and ordinary care” in operating and maintaining those facilities, the bill would clearly assign liability to the owners or operators of ditches and canals if their failure to meet that care standard results in the waste of water, property damage, or injury to others. In addition, if an individual is held liable to a third party for any waste, damage, or injury directly caused by the failure of an owner or operator to exercise reasonable and ordinary care in maintaining a ditch or canal located within a municipality, the bill would allow that individual to recover the amount for which they are liable from the owner or operator of the ditch or canal.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 46 – Water Rights Applications Amendments
Rep. Doug Owens

House Bill 46 seeks to modify Utah Code section 73-3-18 regarding the State Engineer’s process of reinstating lapsed applications. The law currently allows the State Engineer to reinstate a lapsed application within 60 days of the lapsed application upon a showing of reasonable cause but gives no guidance on how a water right owner is to file this request for reinstatement. HB 46 directs the State Engineer to create a reinstatement form that will be used (in conjunction with a request for extension of time) for future requests to reinstate lapsed applications within the 60-day time period. The bill also provides that if an application is reinstated, the priority date will be changed to the date that the request for reinstatement was filed.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 47 – Public Lands Water Rights Amendments
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

House Bill 47 seeks to modify Utah Code sections 73-2-14 and 73-3-31 regarding water claims under Public Water Reserve No. 107. In 1926, President Calvin Coolidge created Public Water Reserve Number 107 through an executive order. Public Water Reserve No. 107 reserved land containing water for the federal government for it to manage livestock watering on these lands. The rationale behind Public Water Reserve No. 107 was to promote western settlement and prevent monopolization of scarce water resources on federally managed lands. Public Water Reserve Number 107 created federal reserved water rights that are leased by the federal government to private individuals for grazing. Currently, Utah Code sections 73-2-14 and 73-3-31 do not recognize Public Water Reserve No. 107 separately and instead combine Public Water Reserve No. 107 uses with livestock water use certificates held by public agencies. HB 47 recognizes that Public Water Reserve No. 107 uses are unique and establishes a procedure and guidelines for federal agencies to file information with the Division of Water Rights so that the State Engineer may determine beneficial use for water claims under Public Water Reserve No. 107.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 81 – Fluoride Amendments
Rep. Stephanie Gricius

House Bill 81 seeks to prohibit public water suppliers from adding fluoride into a public water system.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 89 – Water Transfer Amendments
Rep. Gay Lynn Bennion

House Bill 89 seeks to modify Utah Code section 75-3-1201 regarding “small estate affidavits.” A small estate affidavit is used when a person has passed away and has personal property (such as furniture, jewelry, money in bank accounts, shares of stock, etc.) that are still in the deceased person’s name. The family of the deceased person can fill out the affidavit and then use the affidavit to have the personal property transferred out of the name of the deceased person and into the name of the successors/heirs. The affidavit cannot be used to transfer title to real property and the affidavit can only be used if the total value of the assets is less than $100,000. In the past, the small estate affidavit has been used in circumstances where a deceased person owned shares of stock in an irrigation company and the successors/heirs are seeking to have the irrigation company re-issue the shares into the name of the successors/heirs. HB 89 would disallow this practice. The bill states that “Shares of stock in a water company . . . are not eligible for transfer” using the small estate affidavit. This means that successors/heirs will be forced to go through the probate process in court in order to get water shares transferred out of the name of a deceased person.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 174 – Water Rights Restricted Account
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

House Bill 174 seeks to modify Utah Code section 73-2-1.6 regarding how the Division of Water Rights can utilize funds in the Water Rights Restricted Account. Previously, the law allowed the Division to use funds for legal support related to water right adjudications. HB 174 would allow the Division to use funds for general legal support (i.e., “not limited to geographic areas of adjudication”).

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HB 243 – Agriculture Water Optimization Amendments
Rep. Casey Snider

House Bill 243 seeks to amend two code sections in the Agricultural Water Optimization Act. The current law requires a 25% match for “a drip or automated surge irrigation project.” This language is amended to clarify that the match is for “(A) a subsurface drip irrigation project; (B) an automated surge irrigation project; or (C) a measurement, telemetry, or reporting project.” The bill would also add a provision that money in the Agricultural Water Optimization Account can be used for research that “establishes methods for measuring saved water or the effectiveness of the agricultural water optimization funding.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

HCR 1 – Regarding the Grand County Water Conservancy District
Rep. Carl R. Albrecht

Resolutions do not have the power of law but show the position and will of the legislature and governor (if not vetoed) on the topic addressed. HCR 1 supports the transfer of water infrastructure from the United States Department of Energy to the Grand County Water Conservancy District. The infrastructure and water rights are currently used in the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project to remove radioactive uranium mill tailings from a 130-acre tailings pile adjacent to the Colorado River, just north of Moab. The tailings are transported by rail to a remote off-river site near Crescent Junction. These tailings posed a serious threat to the Colorado River. If not removed, a major flood event would wash the tailings into the river and create a catastrophe for the millions of people who rely on the Colorado River below Moab. This federally funded Project, which is nearing completion, began in 2008 and has already removed 14.4 million tons of tailings. Once the Project is complete, the water infrastructure will no longer be needed by the Department of Energy and could be used for the benefit of Grand County.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 33 – Water Right Recording Amendments
Sen. Evan J. Vickers

Senate Bill 33 seeks to revise Utah Code section 57-3-109 regarding water right deed addenda. The law currently requires that the grantor’s signature on the addendum must be an original signature, whereas the grantee’s signature can be “by facsimile or electronic means.” SB 33 would allow for both the grantor’s and grantee’s signatures to be “by facsimile or electronic means.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 36 – Water Quality Board Amendments
Sen. Todd D. Weiler

Senate Bill 36 seeks to revise Utah Code section 19-5-104 to establish a process for the Utah Quality Board to review settlement negotiations between the director and a party in alleged violation of the Water Quality Act and to issue a final order establishing a reasonable penalty in ongoing settlement negotiations.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 80 – Drinking Water Amendments
Sen. Scott D. Sandall

Senate Bill 80 seeks to enact Utah Code section 19-4-116, which would require the Department of Environmental Quality to establish a fee schedule for the regulation of public water systems in the state. The code section would outline the requirements related to the fee schedule, allow DEQ to establish a financial incentive for compliance, provide for the collection and monitoring of fees, and create an exemption for wholesale water suppliers. DEQ would also be required to evaluate other sources of funding to support the regulation of public water systems. Versions of this bill have appeared in every legislative session for the past several years as the Division of Drinking Water works to identify reliable funding mechanisms for its programs.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 92 – Golf Course Amendments
Sen. Daniel McCay

Senate Bill 92 seeks to authorize the Utah State University Institute of Land, Air, and Water to study the use of water on golf courses in the state. The Institute would identify best practices for water use in Utah relative to golf courses, and then work with golf course owners to “identify strategic water saving opportunities.” The bill also sets up an advisory committee of golf professionals to consult with the Institute. Additionally, the bill would require the Division of State Parks to develop a master plan for state-owned golf courses, which would address water use and conservation. Finally, the bill would classify water data records provided to the Institute as “protected records” under GRAMA.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

SB 131 – Water Commitment Amendments
Sen. Nate Blouin

Senate Bill 131 seeks to amend Utah Code section 73-10-32 regarding water conservation plans. SB 131 would add a provision that a water conservation plan may include information regarding “the commitment of available water to uses on sovereign lands.” In this context, sovereign lands refers to “those lands lying below the ordinary high water mark of navigable bodies of water at the date of statehood and owned by the state by virtue of its sovereignty.”

To read the full text of the bill, click here.