Saturday, March 19, 2016

2016 Legislature: Bills That Passed

H.B. 222: Nonuse Application Amendments
House Bill 222 amends Utah's statute regarding nonuse applications. The bill inserts language into the statute to provide (1) that one or more successive overlapping change applications do not protect a water right that is already subject to forfeiture due to nonuse, and (2) that the approval of one or more nonuse applications does not constitute beneficial use of the water for purposes of calculating the 15-year period during which a forfeiture action must be brought. 
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

H.B. 305 (Second Substitute): Water Rights and Resources Amendments
The Legislature passed Rep. Joel Briscoe's (D-Salt Lake) House Bill 305, which is intended to improve the accuracy of water use data. The bill instructs the Drinking Water Board to require a certified water operator of a public water supplier, or professional engineer performing the duties of an operator, to verify the accuracy of water use and supply data submitted to the Division of Drinking Water. It also provides that the Division of Water Rights may collect and validate water use data. The bill further requires the Division of Water Rights to enact rules specifying the type of water use data that will be reported and how that data will be verified.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

H.B. 464 (Third Substitute): Wildfire on Public Lands and Watersheds
The Utah Legislature passed House Bill 464 to require the Conservation Commission within the Department of Agriculture and Food to work with Utah State University and certain conservation districts to study the environmental and economic impacts of wildfire on public lands in Utah. Among other things, the study will analyze the impacts of wildfire on the state's watersheds and air quality. The Legislature also authorized a one-time, $200,000 appropriation from the General Fund to carry out the study.
To view this bill, click here.

H.C.R. 1: Concurrent Resolution on Waters of the United States
On March 1, Governor Herbert signed House Concurrent Resolution 1, a concurrent resolution expressing his and the Legislature's joint disapproval of the so-called "Waters of the United States" rule. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finalized the rule last year to resolve uncertainty the U.S. Supreme Court created in its divided Rapanos v. United States decision regarding the extent of Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction. The rule has drawn praise from conservation groups and the ire of farmers, industry, and at least 30 states, including Utah, which have filed challenges in courts across the country to stop the rule.
The resolution, which Rep. Mike Noel (R-Kanab) introduced, criticizes the rule as an "unlawful exercise of federal regulatory authority" that will improperly expand the CWA to include dry land and infringe on the ability of states to manage their water resources. It would also express support for Attorney General Sean Reyes's ongoing efforts to vacate the rule. The rule is currently on hold pursuant to a nationwide stay the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued in October while it determines which courts have jurisdiction to hear the various court challenges.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

H.J.R. 4 (First Substitute): Water Infrastructure
House Joint Resolution 4 urges Utah's congressional delegation to support the efforts of Utah water users to secure title transfer of reclamation projects and associated water rights from the federal government to local water user organizations. The project specifically mentioned in the joint resolution are the Strawberry Valley Project, Moon Lake Project, Emery County Project, Sanpete Project, and Provo River Project.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

S.B. 23 (Second Substitute): Protected Purchaser Amendments
Senate Bill 23 modifies the definition of a "protected purchaser" in the Investment Securities chapter of the Utah Uniform Commercial Act. The bill adds additional requirements for a purchaser of a share of stock in a water company to qualify as a protected purchaser. The standard requirements of a protected purchaser are (1) give value, (2) not have notice of an adverse claim, and (3) obtain control of the certificate.  A purchaser of a share of stock in a water company will also need to show that he, or his predecessors in interest, (1) paid assessments on the share for at least four of the prior seven years, or (2) used water available under the share for at least four of the prior seven years.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

S.B. 28: Water System Conservation Pricing
Senate Bill 28, sponsored by Sen. Scott Jenkins (R-Plain City) and recommended by the Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim Committee, sailed through the legislature and was passed on February 10th.  It now awaits the Governor's signature.  It requires retail water providers to establish a tiered rate structure where the price per unit of water increases as the quantity of water delivered increases from tier to tier.  Many water retailers already use tiered pricing as a conservation incentive and to obtain assistance from state revolving loan funds.  Each retailer retains the flexibility of identifying the size and number of tiers or blocks of water and of setting the increasing rate applicable to each tier.  This bill mandates this pricing approach for all "retailer water providers," a term that is already defined by statute as entities which supply culinary water to more than 500 end user connections.  The bill also requires that the end users be given, at least annually, notice of: (1) the amount of water used, (2) the billing cycle or period; and (3) the tiered rates.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

S.B. 75: Adjudication Amendments
Senate Bill 75 makes a number of changes to the general adjudication statutes found in Title 73, Chapter 4 of the Utah Code. As with other general adjudication amendments that have passed in the last few years, this bill seeks to take more responsibility from the Division of Water Rights and puts it on the water users to ensure that timely and proper water claims are filed.
A substantial change is with respect to the hydrographic survey maps. Previously, these surveys of water use were completed as an initial step by the Division of Water Rights, and were the primary source of information that the Division then used to complete Water User's Claims for the water users to review and sign. Under the bill, no survey will be done in the preliminary stages of the adjudication; rather, the hydrographic survey maps will be prepared late in the process-at the same time that the proposed determination is prepared-using the data from the submitted claims to prepare the maps.
Other significant provisions of the bill include:
  -Changing the term "Water User's Claims" to "Statements of Claim"
  -Allowing the Division to accept electronic Statements of Claim
  -Providing a mechanism for water users to ask the Division for an extension of time to file their Statements of Claim
  -Providing additional notice and a public meeting regarding unclaimed rights of record, which will occur after claim are due but before a proposed determination is published. Owners of the unclaimed rights of record may object to the list of unclaimed rights (i.e., assert that their rights should be included in the general adjudication), but the claimants will have to demonstrate that their failure to file a timely statement of claim was excused by circumstances beyond their control, mistake, or other justification.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

S.B. 80 (Second Substitute): Infrastructure Funding Amendments
Senate Bill 80, sponsored by Senator Stuart Adams (R-Layton), moved well through the process and was substituted twice, and then held until the very last day because it includes a budget appropriation.  As substituted, the bill redirects over time a 1/16% sales tax rate from the Transportation Fund back to the water community and places it in the new Water Infrastructure Restricted Account that was created last year.  By 2021, all of these sales tax revenues will go to the new water fund.  This sales tax rate was originally destined for water project funding but got diverted to major transportation needs, most of which have now been met.  Now that the state has identified $33 billion in costs for essential water infrastructure need between now and 2060, there is a clear need for these sales tax funds back in the Water Infrastructure Account.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

S.B. 251 (Third Substitute): Water Infrastructure Funding Amendments
Senate Bill 251, sponsored by Senator Stuart Adams (R-Layton), came out late in the session on March 1st, was substituted three times, and then one version passed the Senate and another the House.  On the last day, the two bodies agreed on a compromise version and passed that version.  The bill, among other things, requires new procedures to be established for funding state water projects on the Bear and Colorado Rivers and funds certain studies related to those projects.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

S.C.R. 1: Concurrent Resolution Encouraging Universal Metering of Water Systems
Senate Concurrent Resolution 1, sponsored by Sen. Scott Jenkins (R-Plain City) and recommended by the Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim Committee, encourages public water suppliers to implement metering of water on "all retail public and private water systems," including secondary water systems, because water users tend to voluntarily conserve more water when they know how much water they are actually using.  It flew through both houses and on to the Governor's desk, who signed the resolution on February 24, 2016.
To view this bill, as enrolled, click here.

No comments: