2010 Legislature: Governor Signs Stream Access Bill

Today, Utah Governor Gary Herbert signed second substitute House Bill 141 into law. HB 141 was sponsored by Representative Kay McIff.

To read more about second substitute House Bill 141, click here.

Brown v. Utah Division of Water Rights

Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Brown v. Division of Water Rights. This case began in 2006 when the Browns' neighbor applied to the Division for a stream alteration permit so that he could build a bridge across Little Cottonwood Creek. The Browns protested the permit, asserting that the bridge would diminish the Creek's ability to handle high water flow and would adversely impact the natural stream environment. Despite the Browns' protest, the Division issued the permit. The Browns filed a request for reconsideration, which the Division denied. The Browns then filed a petition for administrative review with the district court.

The neighbor filed a motion to dismiss the Browns' petition, arguing that the Browns lacked standing because they failed to allege a distinct and palpable injury. The district court agreed, and dismissed the Browns' petition for lack of standing. The Browns appealed to the Utah Court of Appeals, who affirmed the district court's decision. The Browns then appealed to the Utah Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and district court, holding that the Browns did have standing because their allegations established a reasonable probability of future injury. The case has now been remanded for additional proceedings consistent with the Utah Supreme Court's decision.

To read the full opinion, click here.

2010 Legislature: Water Bills

Here are two more water bills that passed the Utah legislature this session:

HB 60 - Water Conveyance Facilities Safety Act (click here to read the substituted bill)
SB 281 - Public Access to Stream Beds - Utah Waterways Task Force

There were several bills that were considered, but were not passed:

HB 84 - Water Banking
HB 171 - Water Rights Revisions
HB 290 - Recreational Use of Privately Owned Stream Beds
HB 343 - Great Salt Lake Advisory Council
HJR 1 - Joint Resolution Amending Provision on Municipal Water Rights
SB 185 - Adoption of Canal Safety Act

2010 Legislature: New Stream Access Bill

Senator Dennis Stowell has introduced Senate Bill 281 (SB 281), entitled "Public Access to Stream Beds - Utah Waterways Task Force."

The bill creates the Utah Waterways Task Force, made up of six state senators and six state representatives, to "study issues concerning private property rights and public recreational access on public waters." These issues include restrictions of access to private beds of public waters, state purchases of access rights, and development of cooperative fish management units. The Task Force is to create a final report, including any proposed legislation, by November 30, 2010.

To read the full text of the bill, click here.

(For an update on this bill, click here.)

2010 Legislature: Substituted Stream Access Bill Passes

Representative McIff's stream access bill (HB 141) was substituted yesterday. The substituted bill is quite different from Representative McIff's original bill or first substitute.

The second substituted bill recognizes a "limited recreational floating right." The bill affirms the right to float that was granted by the Utah Supreme Court in JJNP Co. v. State, but limits the broader recreational access granted by the Utah Supreme Court in Conatser v. Johnson. Essentially, a person has the right to float down a stream (if the stream is capable of being floated on) across private property and can fish while floating, but may not stop on the private property. Incidental touching and portaging are allowed. If a person wants the broader recreational access (i.e., being able to stand on the private streambed to fish), public recreational access will have to be established by showing open, notorious, and adverse recreational use for at least 10 years.

To read the full text of the second substitute bill, click here.

Yesterday, the second substitute bill passed the Senate by a vote of 19 in favor and 10 against. Click here to see how each senator voted.

Today, the second substitute bill passed the House by a vote of 43 in favor, 28 against, and 4 absent or not voting. Click here to see how each representative voted.

The second substitute bill will now be enrolled and sent to Governor Herbert for his signature.

(For an update on this bill, click here.)

2010 Legislature: More Water Bills Passed

Here is an update on more water bills that have passed both the House and the Senate:

HB 231 - Water Rights Priorities in Times of Shortage (click here to read amended bill)
HB 314 - Water Rights Addendums to Deeds (click here to read substituted bill)
HB 298 - Land Use Authority Notification of Canal Development (click here to read substituted bill)
HJR 26 - Joint Resolution Approving Water Rights Addendum Form (click here to read the substituted resolution)
SB 32 - Rainwater Harvesting (click here to read the substituted bill)

As a note, SB 99 (Water Companies and Water Right Change Requests) failed in the Senate.

To see other bills that have passed this session in the Utah legislature, click here and here.

2010 Legislature: More Water Bills Passed

Here is an update on more water bills that have passed both the House and the Senate.

HB 54 - Property Tax Exemption for Water Facilities
HJR 2 - Joint Resolution on Property Tax Exemption for Water Facilities
SB 20 - Local District Amendments

To see other water bills that have passed this session, click here.

2010 Legislature: Change Applications

Representative Kerry Gibson has introduced House Bill 171 (HB 171), entitled "Water Rights Revisions." The purpose of the bill is to allow the State Engineer, in change application proceedings, to review the historical use of the water right and to limit approval of the proposed change to the quantity of water that has been "reasonably applied to beneficial use."

The bill has been amended so that the State Engineer must presume the water right has been used to its full extent--thereby placing the burden on a protestant to show nonuse--and to clarify that any unapproved portion of the water right is not considered forfeited or abandoned.

The amended bill has passed the House and is now being considered in the Senate.

Click here to read the full text of the amended bill.

(For an update on this bill, click here.)